Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs GFACX
FGDKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs GFACX
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$70.32
Change+$0.67 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.01
Change+$0.57 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
FGDKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FGDKX (6.62B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FGDKX (0.23) vs GFACX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FGDKX (17 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FGDKX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. FGDKX (11.50). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 38.50 vs. GFACX (32.77).
| FGDKX | GFACX | FGDKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.36 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.36 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.002 | 19.213 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 12.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.93 | 68.39 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.50 | 32.77 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.99 | 84.76 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement