Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGAGX
FGDKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGAGX
FGDKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Hold and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGDKX (6.52B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FGDKX (0.04). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FGDKX (0.46) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FGDKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RGAGX (2.58). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.70 vs. RGAGX (15.24).
| FGDKX | RGAGX | FGDKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.692 | 10.115 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.51 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 2.58 | 565% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.02 | 46.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.70 | 15.24 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.81 | 111.39 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement