Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGAGX
FGDKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGAGX
FGDKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FGDKX (6.75B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FGDKX (0.21). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FGDKX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FGDKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.45 vs. RGAGX (-0.10). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 24.88 vs. RGAGX (12.42).
| FGDKX | RGAGX | FGDKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.29 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.29 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.087 | 3.984 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.51 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | -0.10 | -10,645% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.97 | 36.14 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | 12.42 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.73 | 99.76 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement