Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGAHX
FGDKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGAHX
FGDKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FGDKX (6.75B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FGDKX (0.21). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FGDKX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FGDKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.45 vs. RGAHX (-0.41). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 24.88 vs. RGAHX (11.23).
| FGDKX | RGAHX | FGDKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.087 | 3.887 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | -0.41 | -2,532% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.97 | 35.06 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | 11.23 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.73 | 96.26 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement