Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGAHX
FGDKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGAHX
FGDKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Hold and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGDKX (6.52B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FGDKX (0.04). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FGDKX (0.46) and RGAHX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FGDKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RGAHX (2.26). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.70 vs. RGAHX (14.00).
| FGDKX | RGAHX | FGDKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.44 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.44 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.692 | 9.995 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.40 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 2.26 | 643% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.02 | 44.90 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.70 | 14.00 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.81 | 107.75 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement