Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$68.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.86
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FGDKX (6.43B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FGDKX (0.24) vs RGEBX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGDKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGDKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.04 vs. FGDKX (13.92). FGDKX (45.67) and RGEBX (45.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGDKX | RGEBX | FGDKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.575 | 17.385 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.43B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.92 | 17.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.63 | 57.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.67 | 45.42 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.51 | 93.79 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement