Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$70.32
Change+$0.67 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.34
Change+$0.64 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FGDKX (6.62B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FGDKX (0.23) vs RGEBX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGDKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGDKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. FGDKX (11.50). RGEBX (38.76) and FGDKX (38.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGDKX | RGEBX | FGDKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.002 | 19.457 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 13.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.93 | 73.31 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.50 | 38.76 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.99 | 96.71 | 196% |