Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FGDKX (6.84B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FGDKX (0.21) vs RGEBX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.54). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGDKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.25 vs. RGEBX (4.66). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 35.04 vs. RGEBX (11.42).
| FGDKX | RGEBX | FGDKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.08 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.08 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.316 | 3.444 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.25 | 4.66 | 456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.56 | 40.73 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.04 | 11.42 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.73 | 92.96 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement