Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs RGEBX
FGDKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Hold and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGDKX (6.52B). FGDKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FGDKX (0.04) vs RGEBX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGDKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.46). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGDKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FGDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RGEBX (1.29). FGDKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.70 vs. RGEBX (9.95).
| FGDKX | RGEBX | FGDKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.08 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.08 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.692 | 9.523 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 1.29 | 1,129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.02 | 41.15 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.70 | 9.95 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.81 | 98.61 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement