FGDL
Price
$61.49
Change
+$1.21 (+2.01%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
469.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLDM
Price
$91.32
Change
+$1.73 (+1.93%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
31.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGDL vs GLDM

FGDL vs GLDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) vs. SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both FGDL and GLDM are physically backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that seek to track the price of gold bullion minus expenses, offering direct exposure to the precious metal without derivatives.
  • FGDL emphasizes responsibly sourced gold in compliance with London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) guidelines, while GLDM holds standard LBMA-approved gold without an explicit responsible-sourcing mandate.
  • GLDM maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.10% compared to 0.15% for FGDL, providing a structural cost advantage over time for long-term holders.
  • Each fund holds a single asset—physical gold bars—in a grantor trust structure, resulting in identical exposure profiles aside from sourcing criteria and fees.
  • Both ETFs serve as core holdings for investors seeking inflation hedging, portfolio diversification, or geopolitical risk mitigation within the commodities sector.
  • Relative positioning favors GLDM for cost efficiency, while FGDL appeals to investors prioritizing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aligned gold sourcing.

Introduction

Gold exchange-traded funds remain relevant for investors navigating persistent inflation concerns, shifting interest rate expectations, and geopolitical uncertainty. FGDL and GLDM do not compete as direct alternatives to equity or bond ETFs but instead provide alternative exposure within the same physical gold sector. They target similar investor goals of capital preservation and diversification through bullion ownership, differing primarily in cost structure and sourcing standards rather than investment strategy.

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) Overview

The Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is a passively managed grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less fund expenses. It holds physical gold bars that meet responsible sourcing standards under LBMA guidelines. The fund maintains one primary holding—allocated gold—and carries an expense ratio of 0.15%. As a thematic commodity vehicle, it offers no equity sector allocations and follows a straightforward buy-and-hold approach without active rebalancing beyond custody requirements. Its distinguishing feature is the explicit focus on responsibly sourced gold, appealing to investors with environmental and governance priorities.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) Overview

The SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is a passively managed grantor trust designed to track the price of gold bullion, less expenses. It holds physical LBMA-approved gold bars as its sole asset. The fund features an expense ratio of 0.10% and operates with minimal structural complexity, requiring no equity holdings or sector allocations. Rebalancing occurs only as needed for custody and creation/redemption activity. Its primary distinction lies in cost efficiency as a smaller-share version of larger gold trusts, making it suitable for investors focused on minimizing ongoing fees while retaining direct gold exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The physical gold ETF sector operates within the broader commodities and precious metals market, influenced by macroeconomic factors including real interest rates, U.S. dollar strength, central bank purchasing activity, and safe-haven demand during periods of market stress. Capital flows into gold products often accelerate during inflationary environments or geopolitical tensions. Regulatory developments around responsible sourcing continue to shape product differentiation, while broader sector risks include storage costs, counterparty exposure in custody arrangements, and potential shifts in investor sentiment toward alternative inflation hedges such as Treasury inflation-protected securities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Both ETFs exhibit highly correlated performance tied directly to gold price movements over recent weeks and months, with minimal tracking differences attributable to expense ratios and minor operational variances. In recent market cycles, lower-cost structures have supported relatively stronger net returns for cost-sensitive investors. GLDM benefits from its fee advantage during periods of range-bound gold prices, while FGDL maintains equivalent volatility profiles. Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between ESG considerations and cost efficiency, with both vehicles providing similar downside protection characteristics during equity market drawdowns.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor GLDM on a probabilistic basis due to its lower expense ratio, which supports stronger net performance consistency across market cycles, combined with equivalent structural integrity and diversification benefits. The cost differential provides a measurable edge in long-term holding scenarios without compromising gold price exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FGDL vs. GLDM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDL is a Buy and GLDM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDM has more net assets: 31.9B vs. FGDL (470M). GLDM (6.970) and FGDL (6.751) have matching annual dividend yield . FGDL was incepted earlier than GLDM: FGDL (4 years) vs GLDM (8 years). GLDM (0.10) has a lower expense ratio than FGDL (0.15).
FGDLGLDMFGDL / GLDM
Gain YTD6.7516.97097%
Net Assets470M31.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.10150%
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence4 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGDLGLDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDP24.211.10
+4.77%
ProShares UltraShort Utilities
QTAC24.160.13
+0.56%
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
QTEC314.190.47
+0.15%
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF
FLUD25.00N/A
N/A
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
EDF5.06-0.03
-0.59%
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund