FGDL
Price
$58.28
Change
-$0.46 (-0.78%)
Updated
Aug 13, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
449.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RING
Price
$76.70
Change
-$2.39 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGDL vs RING

FGDL vs RING Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) vs. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING)

Key Takeaways

  • FGDL provides direct exposure to physical gold bullion through a grantor trust structure, while RING offers equity exposure to global gold mining companies via an MSCI index.
  • FGDL maintains a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.15% compared to RING's 0.39%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • FGDL holds essentially one underlying asset (gold bullion), resulting in concentrated commodity risk, whereas RING diversifies across approximately 42 mining equities with top holdings including Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, and Barrick Gold.
  • Both ETFs target the gold sector but through distinct channels: FGDL tracks bullion prices, and RING captures operational leverage and equity performance of producers.
  • FGDL emphasizes responsibly sourced gold, appealing to ESG-focused investors, while RING reflects broader mining sector dynamics including production costs and geopolitical factors affecting miners.
  • In recent market cycles, FGDL has exhibited lower volatility tied to gold price movements, whereas RING has shown amplified sensitivity due to equity beta in the mining industry.

Introduction

Investors seeking gold-related exposure often evaluate physical bullion vehicles against equity-based mining funds. Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) represent two distinct approaches within the precious metals space. They do not compete directly as substitutes but offer alternative strategies for similar goals: hedging inflation, capturing gold price trends, or gaining sector-specific returns. This comparison highlights structural and exposure differences relevant in environments of fluctuating commodity prices and equity market rotations.

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) Overview

FGDL seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less fund expenses. It is structured as a grantor trust holding physical gold bullion and minimal cash. The ETF tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM benchmark. It contains essentially one holding, with 100% of assets in gold bullion. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. FGDL employs a passive strategy focused on direct commodity exposure without leverage or derivatives. Its distinguishing feature is the emphasis on responsibly sourced gold, aligning with environmental, social, and governance considerations for investors prioritizing ethical sourcing in physical precious metals.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) Overview

RING seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI Global Gold Miners Index, which includes global companies primarily engaged in gold mining. It holds approximately 42 equities in a market-capitalization-weighted structure. Top holdings typically include Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, Barrick Gold, Wheaton Precious Metals, and AngloGold Ashanti. Sector allocation concentrates in materials, specifically precious metals mining. The expense ratio is 0.39%. RING operates as a passive equity ETF with periodic rebalancing to match the index. It provides leveraged exposure to gold prices through mining operations, including factors such as production volumes, costs, and corporate performance.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector benefits from macroeconomic drivers including interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and geopolitical uncertainties that support safe-haven flows. Physical gold prices influence both ETFs, but miners face additional variables such as operational costs, labor issues, regulatory changes in mining jurisdictions, and capital expenditure cycles. Recent market cycles have seen capital flows toward gold amid monetary policy shifts, while equity miners respond to earnings from production and reserve development. Risks include commodity price volatility, currency fluctuations, and environmental regulations affecting mining activities worldwide.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, FGDL has aligned closely with spot gold price movements, offering straightforward exposure with lower volatility. RING has demonstrated greater sensitivity to equity market sentiment and sector-specific catalysts, such as earnings reports from major producers and shifts in global mining output. During periods of rising gold prices, RING often amplifies returns through operational leverage but can underperform in downturns due to fixed costs and equity beta. Relative positioning favors FGDL for pure commodity plays and RING for investors seeking equity upside within the gold value chain, with differences most evident across broader market cycles rather than isolated events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to FGDL. The lower expense ratio and direct physical gold exposure provide a cleaner risk profile with reduced operational complexities compared to RING’s equity mining holdings. Trend consistency in commodity pricing and lower volatility exposure further support this probabilistic assessment in the current environment, though individual investor objectives regarding leverage and sector participation should guide final decisions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FGDL vs. RING commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDL is a Buy and RING is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RING has more net assets: 2.37B vs. FGDL (449M). RING has a higher annual dividend yield than FGDL: RING (8.220) vs FGDL (1.971). FGDL was incepted earlier than RING: FGDL (4 years) vs RING (15 years). FGDL (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RING (0.39).
FGDLRINGFGDL / RING
Gain YTD1.9718.22024%
Net Assets449M2.37B19%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.3938%
TurnoverN/A23.00-
Yield0.001.42-
Fund Existence4 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGDLRING
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLGCX46.160.40
+0.87%
NYLI WMC Growth Class C
MGTSX37.43N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp R6
TROZX27.82N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq Z
CRISX20.60N/A
N/A
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
GSROX18.76N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R

RING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RING has been closely correlated with SSRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RING jumps, then SSRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RING
1D Price
Change %
RING100%
+1.23%
SSRM - RING
85%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
TXG - RING
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
CG - RING
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AR - RING
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
RSG - RING
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More