FGDL
Price
$53.47
Change
-$0.14 (-0.26%)
Updated
Oct 23, 11:05 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
430.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RING
Price
$69.03
Change
-$2.39 (-3.35%)
Updated
Oct 23, 11:18 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGDL vs RING

FGDL vs RING Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) vs. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING)

Key Takeaways

  • FGDL provides direct exposure to physical gold bullion with responsible sourcing standards, while RING offers equity exposure to global gold mining companies.
  • FGDL maintains a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.15% compared to RING’s 0.39%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • FGDL holds essentially one asset (gold), resulting in concentrated commodity risk, whereas RING diversifies across approximately 40-50 mining equities with top holdings including Newmont Corporation (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), and Barrick Mining Corporation.
  • FGDL follows a passive physically backed strategy tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while RING passively tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index.
  • Both ETFs target gold-related themes but differ in risk profiles: FGDL correlates directly with gold prices, and RING exhibits leveraged equity sensitivity to gold prices plus operational mining risks.
  • Structural differences position FGDL for investors seeking pure gold price exposure and RING for those preferring equity upside from producers in the materials sector.

Introduction

Investors seeking gold exposure often evaluate physical commodity ETFs alongside equity-based alternatives in the precious metals space. Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) represent distinct approaches within the same thematic universe. FGDL delivers direct ownership of responsibly sourced gold, while RING provides indirect exposure through global mining equities. These funds do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative tools for portfolio allocation depending on an investor’s preference for commodity purity versus equity participation in the gold value chain.

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) Overview

FGDL is a grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less expenses, by holding physical gold sourced from LBMA-accredited refiners meeting responsible sourcing criteria. The ETF maintains one primary holding—gold bullion—with negligible cash positions. It employs a passive strategy with no active management or rebalancing beyond maintaining physical backing. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. FGDL offers investors a cost-effective vehicle for gold price exposure without the operational risks associated with mining equities. Distinguishing features include its emphasis on environmental, social, and governance standards in gold sourcing.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) Overview

RING is an open-end ETF that seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, providing exposure to companies primarily engaged in gold mining across developed and emerging markets. The fund holds approximately 40-50 equities, with top positions typically including Newmont Corporation (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), Barrick Mining Corporation, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., and AngloGold Ashanti plc. Sector allocation concentrates nearly entirely in materials, specifically metals and mining. RING follows a passive replication methodology with periodic index rebalancing. The expense ratio is 0.39%. The fund’s equity structure introduces company-specific and operational risks alongside gold price sensitivity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector benefits from macroeconomic drivers including inflation hedging, geopolitical uncertainty, and central bank purchasing trends. Mining equities within the materials sector face additional influences from production costs, reserve depletion, regulatory environments, and capital expenditure cycles. Both ETFs operate in an environment shaped by fluctuating interest rate expectations and commodity demand from industrial and investment sources. Capital flows into gold-related products often accelerate during periods of market volatility or currency weakness, while equity miners respond to earnings cycles tied to realized gold prices.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FGDL has exhibited price movements closely aligned with spot gold, delivering direct commodity returns with lower volatility relative to equities. RING has shown amplified responses to gold price changes due to the operating leverage inherent in mining businesses, resulting in greater upside potential during rising gold markets but also heightened drawdowns during corrections. Relative positioning favors FGDL for stability in gold price trends and RING for participation in producer profitability expansions. Sector rotation toward materials has periodically supported RING, while broader commodity demand cycles influence both vehicles over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to FGDL due to its materially lower expense ratio, direct physical gold exposure without equity-specific risks, and straightforward passive strategy. RING offers valuable diversification within mining equities but carries higher costs and operational leverage that may increase volatility in certain market regimes. Investors should evaluate these characteristics against individual objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FGDL vs. RING commentary
Oct 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDL is a Hold and RING is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FGDL with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

FGDL sees MACD Histogram crosses below signal line

FGDL saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 79%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 52 cases where FGDL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FGDL as a result. In 47 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.

FGDL moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for FGDL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGDL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.

The Aroon Indicator for FGDL entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

Following a +2.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGDL advanced for three days, in 230 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

FGDL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for RING with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

RING sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

RING saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 47 of the 52 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 54 of 67 cases where RING's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RING as a result. In 65 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

RING moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for RING crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RING declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for RING entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The 50-day moving average for RING moved above the 200-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +5.68% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RING advanced for three days, in 290 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

RING may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGDLRING
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FGDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

RING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RING has been closely correlated with SSRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RING jumps, then SSRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RING
1D Price
Change %
RING100%
-5.55%
SSRM - RING
86%
Closely correlated
-7.18%
EMR - RING
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
TXG - RING
39%
Loosely correlated
-7.73%
CG - RING
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.18%
AR - RING
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRXV36.290.28
+0.78%
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
ASMG52.33N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long Asml Daily ETF
XPEG4.96N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long Xpev Daily ETF
BKIE33.17-0.30
-0.90%
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE)
UAE19.27-0.45
-2.28%
iShares MSCI UAE ETF (UAE)