Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDMX vs PRMTX
FGDMX vs PRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FGDMX vs PRMTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA
Price$124.52
Change+$0.91 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
Price$170.58
Change+$1.11 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.7B
FGDMX vs PRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDMX vs. PRMTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDMX is a Buy and PRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMTX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. FGDMX (1.97B). FGDMX (0.00) and PRMTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGDMX was incepted earlier than PRMTX: FGDMX (7 years) vs PRMTX (32 years). FGDMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than PRMTX (0.80). FGDMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PRMTX (38.40). FGDMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMTX: FGDMX (0) vs PRMTX (2500). FGDMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.92 vs. PRMTX (16.07). FGDMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.27 vs. PRMTX (8.38).
| FGDMX | PRMTX | FGDMX / PRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.77 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.80 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.603 | 10.630 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 10.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.92 | 16.07 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.98 | 41.19 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.27 | 8.38 | 1,018% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 147.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers