Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDMX vs PRMTX
FGDMX vs PRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FGDMX vs PRMTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA
Price$135.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
Price$163.79
Change-$0.40 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.68B
FGDMX vs PRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDMX vs. PRMTX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDMX is a Hold and PRMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMTX has more cash in the bank: 9.68B vs. FGDMX (2.63B). FGDMX (0.00) and PRMTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGDMX was incepted earlier than PRMTX: FGDMX (7 years) vs PRMTX (32 years). FGDMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than PRMTX (0.80). FGDMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PRMTX (38.40). FGDMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMTX: FGDMX (0) vs PRMTX (2500). FGDMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.90 vs. PRMTX (-0.44). FGDMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.35 vs. PRMTX (-9.15).
| FGDMX | PRMTX | FGDMX / PRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.77 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.80 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.219 | 6.486 | 358% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 9.68B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.90 | -0.44 | -5,175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 135.50 | 46.63 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.35 | -9.15 | -780% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 120.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement