Ad is loading...
FGEMX vs GTCCX
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs GTCCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesM
Price$94.25
Change+$0.32 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
Gabelli Global Content & Connect C
Price$22.81
Change+$0.20 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.5M
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Buy and GTCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. GTCCX (64.5M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: GTCCX (2.60) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGEMX (6 years) vs GTCCX (25 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.24). FGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GTCCX (11.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGEMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). GTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.63 vs. FGEMX (1.98). FGEMX return over 5 years is better than : 65.81 vs. GTCCX (52.20).
| FGEMX | GTCCX | FGEMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.52 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.181 | 6.688 | -197% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 64.5M | 2,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 24.63 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.86 | 27.13 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.81 | 52.20 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.31 | - |