Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGEMX vs GTCCX
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs GTCCX
FGEMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Hold and GTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. GTCCX (88M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: GTCCX (9.55) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGEMX (8 years) vs GTCCX (26 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.19). FGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GTCCX (13.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGEMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). GTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.06 vs. FGEMX (23.86). GTCCX return over 5 years is better than : 68.28 vs. FGEMX (50.86).
| FGEMX | GTCCX | FGEMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.90 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.52 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.924 | 36.633 | 8% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 88M | 3,236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 9.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.86 | 57.06 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.01 | 137.54 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.86 | 68.28 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement