Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Hold and RYCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. RYCSX (14.6M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: RYCSX (0.85) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGEMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.19). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FGEMX (147.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGEMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.76 vs. FGEMX (18.82). FGEMX (44.67) and RYCSX (43.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGEMX | RYCSX | FGEMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.38 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.333 | 25.625 | 5% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 14.6M | 19,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.85 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 56.76 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.75 | 105.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.67 | 43.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement