Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Buy and RYCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. RYCSX (10.3M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: RYCSX (0.95) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGEMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.19). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FGEMX (147.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGEMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.63 vs. FGEMX (2.30). RYCSX (36.10) and FGEMX (35.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGEMX | RYCSX | FGEMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.38 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.895 | 20.284 | -14% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 10.3M | 24,660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 42.63 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.41 | 87.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.08 | 36.10 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers