Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGEMX vs RYCSX
FGEMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGEMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGEMX is a Buy and RYCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGEMX has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. RYCSX (12.8M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGEMX: RYCSX (0.91) vs FGEMX (0.00). FGEMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGEMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGEMX (1.19). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FGEMX (147.00). FGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGEMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.02 vs. FGEMX (15.03). FGEMX return over 5 years is better than : 45.62 vs. RYCSX (42.04).
| FGEMX | RYCSX | FGEMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.38 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.447 | 24.705 | 14% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 12.8M | 20,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.03 | 48.02 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.60 | 98.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.62 | 42.04 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement