FGETF
Price
$8.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
WW
Price
$30.33
Change
-$1.64 (-5.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
302.9M
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGETF vs WW

Header iconFGETF vs WW Comparison
Open Charts FGETF vs WWBanner chart's image
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP
Price$8.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.76B
WW International
Price$30.33
Change-$1.64 (-5.13%)
Volume$202.22K
Capitalization302.9M
FGETF vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGETF vs. WW commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGETF is a Hold and WW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FGETF: $8.10 vs. WW: $30.33)
Brand notoriety: FGETF: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
FGETF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGETF: 28% vs. WW: 63%
Market capitalization -- FGETF: $1.76B vs. WW: $302.9M
FGETF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.76B. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $302.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGETF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WW is a better buy in the long-term than FGETF.

Price Growth

FGETF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGETF($1.76B) has a higher market cap than WW($303M). FGETF has higher P/E ratio than WW: FGETF (25.26) vs WW (2.24). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2288.189 vs. FGETF (-43.909). WW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. FGETF (407M). FGETF has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. WW (152M). WW has less debt than FGETF: WW (477M) vs FGETF (988M). FGETF has higher revenues than WW: FGETF (2.75B) vs WW (741M).
FGETFWWFGETF / WW
Capitalization1.76B303M580%
EBITDA407M1.15B35%
Gain YTD-43.9092288.189-2%
P/E Ratio25.262.241,129%
Revenue2.75B741M371%
Total Cash1.17B152M768%
Total Debt988M477M207%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGETF vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
FGETF
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8890
SMR RATING
1..100
8411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGETF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WW (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FGETF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

FGETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as WW (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FGETF’s stock grew similarly to WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGETF (84) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGETF (79) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FGETF (91) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTEC98.360.61
+0.62%
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
BRIF28.590.08
+0.27%
FIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETF
JHAC15.340.01
+0.09%
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF
GDEC36.18-0.08
-0.22%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Dec
SARK33.02-0.16
-0.48%
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF

FGETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGETF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGETF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGETF
1D Price
Change %
FGETF100%
N/A
HWGG - FGETF
5%
Poorly correlated
+29.68%
WW - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
TCOM - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
CTMLF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDDFF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
+24.32%
More