FGF
Price
$17.15
Change
+$0.74 (+4.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
40M
SLF
Price
$65.40
Change
+$0.78 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
31.65B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGF vs SLF

Header iconFGF vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FGF vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$17.15
Change+$0.74 (+4.51%)
Volume$403
Capitalization40M
Sun Life Financial
Price$65.40
Change+$0.78 (+1.21%)
Volume$327.55K
Capitalization31.65B
FGF vs SLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGF vs. SLF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGF is a Hold and SLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FGF: $17.15 vs. SLF: $65.40)
Brand notoriety: FGF and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGF: 10% vs. SLF: 41%
Market capitalization -- FGF: $40M vs. SLF: $31.65B
FGF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $40M. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGF is a better buy in the short-term than SLF.

Price Growth

FGF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

SLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.02% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($31.6B) has a higher market cap than FGF($40M). SLF has higher P/E ratio than FGF: SLF (13.86) vs FGF (6.71). SLF YTD gains are higher at: 10.212 vs. FGF (-21.331). SLF has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. FGF (2.4M). FGF has less debt than SLF: FGF (387K) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than FGF: SLF (32.7B) vs FGF (23.7M).
FGFSLFFGF / SLF
Capitalization40M31.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.33110.212-209%
P/E Ratio6.7113.8648%
Revenue23.7M32.7B0%
Total Cash2.4M27.5B0%
Total Debt387K13.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGF vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGF
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGF (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

FGF's SMR Rating (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGF’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FGF (82) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORX13.560.98
+7.82%
2x Corn ETF
SGDM45.850.40
+0.87%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
JPC8.12N/A
N/A
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
CA24.25-0.01
-0.02%
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
DBB19.40-0.07
-0.36%
Invesco DB Base Metals

FGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGF and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGF and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGF
1D Price
Change %
FGF100%
+4.51%
FIHL - FGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
ALIZY - FGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
ESGR - FGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGLO - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
SLF - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More