Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFAX vs MDIHX
FGFAX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts FGFAX vs MDIHX
FGFAX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFAX vs. MDIHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFAX is a Buy and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 44.3B vs. FGFAX (1.53B). FGFAX pays higher dividends than MDIHX: FGFAX (2.01) vs MDIHX (1.85). FGFAX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: FGFAX (28 years) vs MDIHX (21 years). FGFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.10). FGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MDIHX (2.00). MDIHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGFAX: MDIHX (0) vs FGFAX (1500). MDIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. FGFAX (16.96). MDIHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.86 vs. FGFAX (18.03).
| FGFAX | MDIHX | FGFAX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.08 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.432 | 10.026 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 44.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.85 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 19.48 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.62 | 47.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 29.86 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.89 | 135.56 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers