Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFAX vs MDIHX
FGFAX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts FGFAX vs MDIHX
FGFAX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFAX vs. MDIHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFAX is a Buy and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 42.8B vs. FGFAX (1.44B). FGFAX pays higher dividends than MDIHX: FGFAX (2.00) vs MDIHX (1.78). FGFAX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: FGFAX (28 years) vs MDIHX (21 years). FGFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.10). FGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MDIHX (1.00). MDIHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGFAX: MDIHX (0) vs FGFAX (1500). MDIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. FGFAX (5.07). MDIHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.60 vs. FGFAX (12.33).
| FGFAX | MDIHX | FGFAX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.08 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.782 | 12.127 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 42.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 13.36 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.45 | 51.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.33 | 29.60 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.40 | 123.68 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers