Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFAX vs VTMGX
FGFAX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGFAX vs VTMGX
FGFAX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFAX vs. VTMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFAX is a Buy and VTMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 316B vs. FGFAX (1.49B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than FGFAX: VTMGX (2.52) vs FGFAX (1.99). FGFAX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: FGFAX (28 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). FGFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). FGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). FGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FGFAX (1500) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.39 vs. FGFAX (11.24). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.40 vs. FGFAX (15.80).
| FGFAX | VTMGX | FGFAX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.05 | 2,180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.05 | 2,460% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.482 | 13.766 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 316B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.24 | 25.39 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.92 | 52.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.80 | 40.40 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.27 | 107.67 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement