Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFAX vs VTMGX
FGFAX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGFAX vs VTMGX
FGFAX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFAX vs. VTMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFAX is a Buy and VTMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. FGFAX (1.53B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than FGFAX: VTMGX (2.60) vs FGFAX (2.01). FGFAX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: FGFAX (28 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). FGFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). FGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). FGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FGFAX (1500) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.39 vs. FGFAX (16.96). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.75 vs. FGFAX (18.03).
| FGFAX | VTMGX | FGFAX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.05 | 2,180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.05 | 2,460% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.432 | 16.013 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 317B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 2.60 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 31.39 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.62 | 62.84 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 42.75 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.89 | 123.73 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers