Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs MDIHX
FGFCX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs MDIHX
FGFCX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. MDIHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Buy and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. FGFCX (1.49B). MDIHX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: MDIHX (1.86) vs FGFCX (1.55). FGFCX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: FGFCX (28 years) vs MDIHX (21 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.10). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MDIHX (2.00). MDIHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGFCX: MDIHX (0) vs FGFCX (1500). MDIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.63 vs. FGFCX (9.56). MDIHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.57 vs. FGFCX (8.52).
| FGFCX | MDIHX | FGFCX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.08 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.10 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.053 | 9.362 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 43.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.86 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 15.63 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.51 | 41.45 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 28.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.56 | 121.91 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement