Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs VTMNX
FGFCX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs VTMNX
FGFCX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. VTMNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Buy and VTMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 316B vs. FGFCX (1.49B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: VTMNX (2.54) vs FGFCX (1.55). FGFCX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: FGFCX (28 years) vs VTMNX (26 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). FGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: FGFCX (1500) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.43 vs. FGFCX (9.56). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.44 vs. FGFCX (8.52).
| FGFCX | VTMNX | FGFCX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.03 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.03 | 6,600% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.053 | 13.806 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 316B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 2.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 25.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.51 | 52.97 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 40.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.56 | 107.65 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement