Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs MDIHX
FGFRX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs MDIHX
FGFRX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. MDIHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Buy and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 42.8B vs. FGFRX (1.44B). FGFRX pays higher dividends than MDIHX: FGFRX (1.88) vs MDIHX (1.78). FGFRX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: FGFRX (13 years) vs MDIHX (21 years). FGFRX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.10). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MDIHX (1.00). FGFRX (0) and MDIHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. FGFRX (4.84). MDIHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.60 vs. FGFRX (11.18).
| FGFRX | MDIHX | FGFRX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.08 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.10 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.686 | 12.127 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 42.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 13.36 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 51.44 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.18 | 29.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.76 | 123.68 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement