Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs MDIHX
FGFRX vs MDIHX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs MDIHX
FGFRX vs MDIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. MDIHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and MDIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIHX has more cash in the bank: 44.6B vs. FGFRX (1.53B). FGFRX (1.89) and MDIHX (1.85) have matching dividends . FGFRX was incepted earlier than MDIHX: FGFRX (13 years) vs MDIHX (21 years). FGFRX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MDIHX (1.10). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MDIHX (2.00). FGFRX (0) and MDIHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.73 vs. FGFRX (13.03). MDIHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.94 vs. FGFRX (12.41).
| FGFRX | MDIHX | FGFRX / MDIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.08 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.10 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.491 | 9.436 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 44.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.85 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.03 | 17.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.61 | 46.99 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.41 | 27.94 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.63 | 123.06 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement