Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VTMNX
FGFRX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VTMNX
FGFRX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VTMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and VTMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. FGFRX (1.53B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VTMNX (2.61) vs FGFRX (1.89). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: FGFRX (13 years) vs VTMNX (25 years). FGFRX (1.63) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: FGFRX (0) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.00 vs. FGFRX (13.03). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.65 vs. FGFRX (12.41).
| FGFRX | VTMNX | FGFRX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.03 | 5,433% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.491 | 15.497 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 304B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.61 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.03 | 29.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.61 | 60.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.41 | 40.65 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.63 | 107.24 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement