Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGGBX vs FWCBX
FGGBX vs FWCBX Comparison
Open Charts FGGBX vs FWCBX
FGGBX vs FWCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FGGBX (326M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: FGGBX (6.11) vs FWCBX (2.97). FGGBX was incepted earlier than FWCBX: FGGBX (13 years) vs FWCBX (6 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FGGBX (50.24) and FWCBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: FWCBX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.21 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. FGGBX (29.53).
| FGGBX | FWCBX | FGGBX / FWCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.31 | 287% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.31 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.319 | 7.411 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.11 | 2.97 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.21 | 12.18 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.42 | 42.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.53 | 42.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement