Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs GTCCX
FGHMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs GTCCX
FGHMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Buy and GTCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. GTCCX (84.6M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: GTCCX (9.90) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGHMX (8 years) vs GTCCX (26 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.69). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GTCCX (13.00). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGHMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). GTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.73 vs. FGHMX (-3.21). GTCCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. FGHMX (33.45).
| FGHMX | GTCCX | FGHMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.90 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.52 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.282 | 33.103 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 84.6M | 2,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 9.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.21 | 29.73 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.78 | 118.68 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.45 | 63.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers