Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs GTCCX
FGHMX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs GTCCX
FGHMX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. GTCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Hold and GTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. GTCCX (82.4M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: GTCCX (9.55) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FGHMX (8 years) vs GTCCX (26 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.69). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GTCCX (13.00). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FGHMX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). GTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.98 vs. FGHMX (17.90). GTCCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.90 vs. FGHMX (40.79).
| FGHMX | GTCCX | FGHMX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.90 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.52 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.907 | 30.426 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 82.4M | 3,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 9.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.90 | 49.98 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.52 | 124.30 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.79 | 60.90 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement