Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs PRMTX
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs PRMTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
Price$137.93
Change+$0.15 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
Price$178.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.82B
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. PRMTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Buy and PRMTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMTX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FGHMX (2.26B). FGHMX (0.00) and PRMTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGHMX was incepted earlier than PRMTX: FGHMX (7 years) vs PRMTX (32 years). FGHMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRMTX (0.80). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PRMTX (38.40). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMTX: FGHMX (0) vs PRMTX (2500). FGHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.30 vs. PRMTX (19.85). FGHMX return over 5 years is better than : 98.15 vs. PRMTX (7.41).
| FGHMX | PRMTX | FGHMX / PRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.77 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.312 | 15.377 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 10.8B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.30 | 19.85 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.03 | 47.21 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.15 | 7.41 | 1,325% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.86 | - |