Ad is loading...
FGHMX vs PRMTX
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs PRMTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
Price$100.85
Change-$0.20 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
Price$156.99
Change-$1.10 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.88B
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. PRMTX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a StrongBuy and PRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMTX has more cash in the bank: 9.88B vs. FGHMX (1.58B). FGHMX (0.00) and PRMTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGHMX was incepted earlier than PRMTX: FGHMX (6 years) vs PRMTX (32 years). FGHMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRMTX (0.80). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PRMTX (38.40). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMTX: FGHMX (0) vs PRMTX (2500). PRMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.91 vs. FGHMX (8.13). FGHMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.44 vs. PRMTX (15.87).
| FGHMX | PRMTX | FGHMX / PRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.77 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.989 | 1.816 | -220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 9.88B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 15.91 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.22 | 27.41 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.44 | 15.87 | 406% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...