Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs PRMTX
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs PRMTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
Price$123.04
Change-$0.53 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
Price$171.20
Change-$0.66 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.52B
FGHMX vs PRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. PRMTX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a StrongBuy and PRMTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMTX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FGHMX (2.14B). FGHMX (0.00) and PRMTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGHMX was incepted earlier than PRMTX: FGHMX (7 years) vs PRMTX (32 years). FGHMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRMTX (0.80). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PRMTX (38.40). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMTX: FGHMX (0) vs PRMTX (2500). FGHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.16 vs. PRMTX (16.95). FGHMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.27 vs. PRMTX (0.64).
| FGHMX | PRMTX | FGHMX / PRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.77 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.641 | 11.460 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 10.5B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.16 | 16.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.12 | 31.08 | 306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.27 | 0.64 | 11,053% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 164.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers