Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Hold and RYCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. RYCSX (14.6M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: RYCSX (0.85) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGHMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.69). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FGHMX (147.00). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGHMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.76 vs. FGHMX (13.94). RYCSX return over 5 years is better than : 43.30 vs. FGHMX (35.82).
| FGHMX | RYCSX | FGHMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.38 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.707 | 25.625 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 14.6M | 19,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.85 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.94 | 56.76 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.77 | 105.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | 43.30 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers