Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Buy and RYCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. RYCSX (10.5M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: RYCSX (0.92) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGHMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.69). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FGHMX (147.00). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGHMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.45 vs. FGHMX (-3.84). RYCSX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. FGHMX (31.50).
| FGHMX | RYCSX | FGHMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.38 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.372 | 23.345 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 10.5M | 23,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.84 | 29.45 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.67 | 93.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.50 | 41.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers