Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs RYCSX
FGHMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Buy and RYCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. RYCSX (10.3M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: RYCSX (0.95) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGHMX (8 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.69). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FGHMX (147.00). FGHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGHMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.63 vs. FGHMX (1.51). RYCSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.10 vs. FGHMX (31.46).
| FGHMX | RYCSX | FGHMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.38 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.360 | 20.284 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 10.3M | 24,660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.51 | 42.63 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.55 | 87.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.46 | 36.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers