Ad is loading...
FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs RGFTX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure A
Price$11.59
Change+$0.41 (+3.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.56M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.21
Change+$0.32 (+3.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.74M
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGIAX has more cash in the bank: 404M vs. RGFTX (317M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGIAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs FGIAX (2.10). FGIAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIAX (17 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). FGIAX (1.30) and RGFTX (1.24) have similar cost to investors . FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIAX (3000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. FGIAX (4.49). FGIAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. RGFTX (16.69).
| FGIAX | RGFTX | FGIAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.887 | -1.341 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 404M | 317M | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 3.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 5.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.32 | -0.02 | 11,471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.44 | 16.69 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...