Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 611M vs. FGIAX (579M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGIAX: RGFTX (2.64) vs FGIAX (2.49). FGIAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIAX (19 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGIAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIAX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. FGIAX (3.30). RGFTX (22.29) and FGIAX (21.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIAX | RGFTX | FGIAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.22 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.207 | 10.249 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 611M | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.64 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 8.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.29 | 36.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.70 | 22.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement