Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. FGIAX (574M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGIAX: RGFTX (3.10) vs FGIAX (2.46). FGIAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIAX (19 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGIAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIAX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. FGIAX (6.14). FGIAX (23.88) and RGFTX (23.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIAX | RGFTX | FGIAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.22 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.124 | 11.067 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 574M | 616M | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.10 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 10.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.27 | 36.69 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.88 | 23.08 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement