Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. FGIAX (571M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGIAX: RGFTX (2.64) vs FGIAX (2.49). FGIAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIAX (19 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGIAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIAX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. FGIAX (1.14). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.33 vs. FGIAX (17.68).
| FGIAX | RGFTX | FGIAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.22 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.957 | 9.533 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 605M | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.64 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.14 | 5.94 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.85 | 42.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.68 | 19.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement