Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs RGFTX
FGIAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 593M vs. FGIAX (532M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGIAX: RGFTX (3.16) vs FGIAX (2.53). FGIAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGIAX (18 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGIAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: RGFTX (0) vs FGIAX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.09 vs. FGIAX (0.48). FGIAX (18.01) and RGFTX (17.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGIAX | RGFTX | FGIAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.22 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.872 | 7.114 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 593M | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 6.09 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.40 | 35.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.01 | 17.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement