Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGILX vs RWIBX
FGILX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts FGILX vs RWIBX
FGILX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGILX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGILX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FGILX (470M). FGILX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: FGILX (0.84) vs RWIBX (0.71). FGILX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: FGILX (14 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FGILX (0.91). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIBX: FGILX (0) vs RWIBX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.12 vs. RWIBX (13.15). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. RWIBX (27.05).
| FGILX | RWIBX | FGILX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.555 | 12.774 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.71 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.12 | 13.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.69 | 40.71 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.84 | 27.05 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.25 | 85.66 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement