Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGILX vs RWIBX
FGILX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts FGILX vs RWIBX
FGILX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGILX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGILX is a StrongBuy and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FGILX (473M). FGILX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: FGILX (0.83) vs RWIBX (0.74). FGILX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: FGILX (14 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FGILX (0.91). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIBX: FGILX (0) vs RWIBX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.38 vs. RWIBX (17.83). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 52.36 vs. RWIBX (27.84).
| FGILX | RWIBX | FGILX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.530 | 13.017 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.38 | 17.83 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.60 | 46.73 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.36 | 27.84 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.80 | 98.11 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement