Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGILX vs RWIFX
FGILX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts FGILX vs RWIFX
FGILX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGILX vs. RWIFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGILX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FGILX (472M). RWIFX pays higher dividends than FGILX: RWIFX (1.60) vs FGILX (0.89). FGILX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: FGILX (14 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). FGILX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). RWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIFX: FGILX (0) vs RWIFX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.92 vs. RWIFX (15.97). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. RWIFX (34.86).
| FGILX | RWIFX | FGILX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.46 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.46 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.919 | 14.215 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.60 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.92 | 15.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.77 | 45.49 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | 34.86 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.44 | 96.90 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers