Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGILX vs RWIFX
FGILX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts FGILX vs RWIFX
FGILX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGILX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGILX is a StrongBuy and RWIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FGILX (473M). RWIFX pays higher dividends than FGILX: RWIFX (1.57) vs FGILX (0.83). FGILX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: FGILX (14 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). FGILX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). RWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIFX: FGILX (0) vs RWIFX (250). FGILX (23.38) and RWIFX (22.26) have marching annual gain over last year. FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 52.36 vs. RWIFX (37.12).
| FGILX | RWIFX | FGILX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.46 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.46 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.530 | 15.808 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.57 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.38 | 22.26 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.60 | 54.76 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.36 | 37.12 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.80 | 112.87 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement