Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMEBX
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.73
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGINX (1.49B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGINX (1.73) vs RMEBX (1.09). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and FGINX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMEBX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. RMEBX (7.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. FGINX (47.93).
| FGINX | RMEBX | FGINX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.154 | 11.179 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.09 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 7.45 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 31.44 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 55.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.31 | 89.18 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement