Ad is loading...
FGINX vs RMEBX
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$14.58
Change-$0.65 (-4.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.45
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FGINX (1.41B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGINX (2.03) vs RMEBX (1.18). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and FGINX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGINX (26.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMEBX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FGINX (0.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 74.87 vs. FGINX (64.43).
| FGINX | RMEBX | FGINX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.337 | 2.774 | 192% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.18 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 6.63 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 11.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.43 | 74.87 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.34 | 63.22 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...