Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMEBX
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$17.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FGINX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.51B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.05). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and FGINX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMEBX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. RMEBX (7.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.63 vs. FGINX (52.40).
| FGINX | RMEBX | FGINX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.274 | 14.812 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.05 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 7.29 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 43.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.40 | 59.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.14 | 92.37 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement