Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKFX vs RGAGX
FGKFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGKFX vs RGAGX
FGKFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGKFX (28.1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FGKFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FGKFX (0.00). FGKFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FGKFX (7 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FGKFX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGKFX (15.00). FGKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FGKFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FGKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.63 vs. RGAGX (0.49). FGKFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.90 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FGKFX | RGAGX | FGKFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.865 | 9.321 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.63 | 0.49 | 5,443% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.66 | 44.65 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.90 | 15.00 | 646% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers