Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKMX vs RYCSX
FGKMX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs RYCSX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$141.99
Change+$0.75 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
Rydex Telecommunications C
Price$47.33
Change+$0.31 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02M
FGKMX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. RYCSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a Buy and RYCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. RYCSX (11M). RYCSX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: RYCSX (0.19) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FGKMX (7 years) vs RYCSX (24 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FGKMX (83.00). FGKMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FGKMX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). FGKMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.38 vs. RYCSX (32.08). FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.43 vs. RYCSX (30.80).
| FGKMX | RYCSX | FGKMX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.43 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.231 | 21.813 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 11M | 20,518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.38 | 32.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.90 | 37.11 | 312% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.43 | 30.80 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement