Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGLGX vs RWMFX
FGLGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FGLGX vs RWMFX
FGLGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGLGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGLGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FGLGX (30.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FGLGX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FGLGX (1.14). FGLGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FGLGX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FGLGX (0.00). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGLGX (17.00). FGLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FGLGX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. RWMFX (5.49). FGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 63.43 vs. RWMFX (26.78).
| FGLGX | RWMFX | FGLGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.497 | 5.853 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.1B | 218B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.41 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | 5.49 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.59 | 31.74 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.43 | 26.78 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.06 | 79.92 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement