Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs RGFTX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.24M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.34M
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNCX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. RGFTX (347M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: RGFTX (3.01) vs FGNCX (1.42). FGNCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGNCX (16 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). FGNCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: RGFTX (0) vs FGNCX (3000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. FGNCX (12.93). FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.10 vs. RGFTX (44.00).
| FGNCX | RGFTX | FGNCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.91 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.24 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.859 | 7.759 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 347M | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 3.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 15.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.65 | 9.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.10 | 44.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers