Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs RGFTX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.89M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.26M
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNCX has more cash in the bank: 485M vs. RGFTX (350M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: RGFTX (3.12) vs FGNCX (1.33). FGNCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGNCX (17 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGNCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: RGFTX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. FGNCX (5.25). FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.38 vs. RGFTX (28.42).
| FGNCX | RGFTX | FGNCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.91 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.821 | 17.160 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 485M | 350M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 3.12 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 10.19 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.50 | 29.41 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.38 | 28.42 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement