Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs RGFTX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.44M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.01M
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNCX has more cash in the bank: 471M vs. RGFTX (364M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: RGFTX (2.69) vs FGNCX (1.35). FGNCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGNCX (17 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). FGNCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: RGFTX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.41 vs. FGNCX (13.70). FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.41 vs. RGFTX (19.03).
| FGNCX | RGFTX | FGNCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.91 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.834 | 13.419 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 471M | 364M | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.69 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.70 | 16.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 15.92 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.41 | 19.03 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers