Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 611M vs. FGNCX (579M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: RGFTX (2.64) vs FGNCX (1.25). FGNCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGNCX (18 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: RGFTX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. FGNCX (2.21). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.29 vs. FGNCX (16.51).
| FGNCX | RGFTX | FGNCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.91 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.22 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.593 | 10.249 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 611M | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.64 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 8.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.93 | 36.94 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.51 | 22.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement