Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs RGFTX
FGNCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 598M vs. FGNCX (565M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: RGFTX (3.16) vs FGNCX (1.27). FGNCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FGNCX (18 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: RGFTX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. FGNCX (3.80). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.59 vs. FGNCX (16.96).
| FGNCX | RGFTX | FGNCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.91 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.22 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.086 | 9.244 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 598M | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 3.16 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 10.01 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.82 | 38.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.96 | 20.59 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement