Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNSX vs FMUSX
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNSX vs FMUSX
Strategic Advisers Tx-Snstv Shrt Dur
Price$10.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.42B
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultrashort IS
Price$10.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNSX vs. FMUSX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNSX is a Hold and FMUSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. FMUSX (1.21B). FGNSX (3.27) and FMUSX (3.17) have matching dividends . FGNSX was incepted earlier than FMUSX: FGNSX (7 years) vs FMUSX (25 years). FMUSX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.34). FGNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FMUSX (55.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: FGNSX (0) vs FMUSX (1000000). FGNSX (3.84) and FMUSX (3.74) have marching annual gain over last year. FMUSX (10.24) and FGNSX (9.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGNSX | FMUSX | FGNSX / FMUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.36 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.432 | 1.312 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 1.21B | 282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 3.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 9.84 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.91 | 10.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers