Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNSX vs FMUSX
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNSX vs FMUSX
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNSX vs. FMUSX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNSX is a Hold and FMUSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 2.97B vs. FMUSX (1.47B). FGNSX pays higher dividends than FMUSX: FGNSX (3.07) vs FMUSX (2.89). FGNSX was incepted earlier than FMUSX: FGNSX (8 years) vs FMUSX (26 years). FMUSX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.34). FGNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FMUSX (47.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: FGNSX (0) vs FMUSX (1000000). FGNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. FMUSX (3.24). FGNSX (12.65) and FMUSX (12.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGNSX | FMUSX | FGNSX / FMUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.36 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.236 | 1.145 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97B | 1.47B | 203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.89 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 3.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 11.05 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.65 | 12.09 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers