Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGNSX vs FMUSX
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNSX vs FMUSX
FGNSX vs FMUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNSX vs. FMUSX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNSX is a Hold and FMUSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 3.18B vs. FMUSX (1.5B). FGNSX pays higher dividends than FMUSX: FGNSX (3.04) vs FMUSX (2.84). FGNSX was incepted earlier than FMUSX: FGNSX (9 years) vs FMUSX (26 years). FMUSX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.35). FGNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FMUSX (47.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUSX: FGNSX (0) vs FMUSX (1000000). FGNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. FMUSX (1.96). FGNSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.93 vs. FMUSX (12.21).
| FGNSX | FMUSX | FGNSX / FMUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.36 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.45 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.492 | 1.231 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.18B | 1.5B | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.84 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | 1.96 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 10.28 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 12.21 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers