FGNX
Price
$7.09
Change
-$1.12 (-13.64%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
51.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TWAV
Price
$1.37
Change
-$0.08 (-5.52%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGNX vs TWAV

Header iconFGNX vs TWAV Comparison
Open Charts FGNX vs TWAVBanner chart's image
FGNX vs TWAV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGNX vs. TWAV commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNX is a Hold and TWAV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FGNX: $8.16 vs. TWAV: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: FGNX and TWAV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGNX: 64% vs. TWAV: 55%
Market capitalization -- FGNX: $51.12M vs. TWAV: $5.01M
FGNX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $51.12M. TWAV’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $158.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGNX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTWAV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGNX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TWAV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGNX is a better buy in the long-term than TWAV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGNX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWAV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGNX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TWAV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGNX is a better buy in the short-term than TWAV.

Price Growth

FGNX (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.32% price change this week, while TWAV (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.33% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNX($51.1M) has a higher market cap than TWAV($5.01M). TWAV YTD gains are higher at: -19.889 vs. FGNX (-40.618).
FGNXTWAVFGNX / TWAV
Capitalization51.1M5.01M1,020%
EBITDA-68.56MN/A-
Gain YTD-40.618-19.889204%
P/E Ratio2.28N/A-
Revenue2.41MN/A-
Total Cash31.3MN/A-
Total Debt1.86MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGNX vs TWAV: Fundamental Ratings
FGNX
TWAV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TWAV's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FGNX (95) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that TWAV’s stock grew similarly to FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

TWAV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FGNX (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that TWAV’s stock grew similarly to FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

TWAV's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as FGNX (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that TWAV’s stock grew similarly to FGNX’s over the last 12 months.

FGNX's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as TWAV (61) in the null industry. This means that FGNX’s stock grew similarly to TWAV’s over the last 12 months.

FGNX's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWAV (66) in the null industry. This means that FGNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWAV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGNXTWAV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGNX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TWAV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSPHX24.32N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Health Care
HADAX31.34N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced HLS IA
JAREX14.65N/A
N/A
Easterly Global Real Estate A
RGIYX10.59N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure Y
WGISX13.66N/A
N/A
Wasatch International Select Instl

TWAV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWAV has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TWAV jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWAV
1D Price
Change %
TWAV100%
-1.36%
TROW - TWAV
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
DFDV - TWAV
34%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
GDEV - TWAV
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
BN - TWAV
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
PHUN - TWAV
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More