FGNXP
Price
$20.03
Change
-$0.42 (-2.05%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SLF
Price
$58.06
Change
+$0.10 (+0.17%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.56B
83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGNXP vs SLF

Header iconFGNXP vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FGNXP vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$20.03
Change-$0.42 (-2.05%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.06
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
Volume$5.47K
Capitalization32.56B
FGNXP vs SLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGNXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGNXP vs. SLF commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNXP is a StrongBuy and SLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FGNXP: $20.45 vs. SLF: $57.96)
Brand notoriety: FGNXP and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGNXP: 127% vs. SLF: 416%
Market capitalization -- FGNXP: $0 vs. SLF: $32.56B
FGNXP [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $0. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $32.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGNXP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGNXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGNXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGNXP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGNXP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than FGNXP.

Price Growth

FGNXP (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -6.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.67% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNXP YTD gains are higher at: 32.362 vs. SLF (-2.326).
FGNXPSLFFGNXP / SLF
CapitalizationN/A32.6B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.362-2.326-1,392%
P/E RatioN/A14.16-
RevenueN/A33B-
Total CashN/A26.2B-
Total DebtN/A6.38B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGNXP vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGNXP
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGNXP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's SMR Rating (97) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

FGNXP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGNXPSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGNXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCG81.500.69
+0.85%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
TRTY27.080.13
+0.48%
Cambria Trinity ETF
JGRW26.850.12
+0.46%
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
RFCI22.680.08
+0.34%
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
XEMD43.630.08
+0.20%
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD EM 1-10 Yr BdETF

FGNXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGNXP and ORI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGNXP and ORI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGNXP
1D Price
Change %
FGNXP100%
-0.24%
ORI - FGNXP
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
EQH - FGNXP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
SLF - FGNXP
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
ACGL - FGNXP
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
DIISY - FGNXP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+0.63%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
ORI - SLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
AEG - SLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BNT - SLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More