Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGPGX vs LSPAX
FGPGX vs LSPAX Comparison
Open Charts FGPGX vs LSPAX
FGPGX vs LSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGPGX vs. LSPAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGPGX is a Hold and LSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGPGX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. LSPAX (74.2M). LSPAX pays higher dividends than FGPGX: LSPAX (7.97) vs FGPGX (0.51). FGPGX was incepted earlier than LSPAX: FGPGX (6 years) vs LSPAX (13 years). LSPAX (3.49) is less costly to investors than FGPGX (0.49). LSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FGPGX (1.00). FGPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSPAX: FGPGX (250) vs LSPAX (2500). LSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. FGPGX (7.94). LSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.40 vs. FGPGX (21.89).
| FGPGX | LSPAX | FGPGX / LSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 3.44 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 3.49 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.342 | 12.616 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 74.2M | 37,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 7.97 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 13.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.57 | 38.57 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.89 | 24.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers