Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGPGX vs TSAHX
FGPGX vs TSAHX Comparison
Open Charts FGPGX vs TSAHX
FGPGX vs TSAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGPGX vs. TSAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGPGX is a Hold and TSAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGPGX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. TSAHX (290M). TSAHX pays higher dividends than FGPGX: TSAHX (1.17) vs FGPGX (0.51). FGPGX was incepted earlier than TSAHX: FGPGX (6 years) vs TSAHX (11 years). TSAHX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FGPGX (0.49). TSAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FGPGX (1.00). FGPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSAHX: FGPGX (250) vs TSAHX (100000). FGPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. TSAHX (7.40). FGPGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.89 vs. TSAHX (20.48).
| FGPGX | TSAHX | FGPGX / TSAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.342 | 9.784 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 290M | 9,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.17 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 7.40 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.57 | 52.21 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.89 | 20.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers