Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRAX vs RGACX
FGRAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FGRAX vs RGACX
FGRAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FGRAX (4.32B). FGRAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGRAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FGRAX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and FGRAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGRAX (27.59). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGRAX: RGACX (250) vs FGRAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. FGRAX (-12.15). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. FGRAX (-25.78).
| FGRAX | RGACX | FGRAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.93 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.93 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.012 | 5.397 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.32B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.15 | 0.93 | -1,310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.22 | 33.65 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.78 | 10.91 | -236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.22 | 94.42 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement