Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRAX vs RGAGX
FGRAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGRAX vs RGAGX
FGRAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FGRAX (4.66B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FGRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FGRAX (0.00). FGRAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FGRAX (27 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FGRAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGRAX (27.59). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGRAX: RGAGX (250) vs FGRAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. FGRAX (-1.02). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.74 vs. FGRAX (-16.52).
| FGRAX | RGAGX | FGRAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.29 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.29 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.964 | 9.458 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | 12.74 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.97 | 47.47 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.52 | 23.74 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.40 | 117.20 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement