Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRAX vs RGEBX
FGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGRAX vs RGEBX
FGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FGRAX (4.59B). FGRAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGRAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGRAX (27 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGRAX (0.89). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGRAX (27.59). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGRAX: RGEBX (250) vs FGRAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FGRAX (-5.59). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.39 vs. FGRAX (-21.97).
| FGRAX | RGEBX | FGRAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.779 | 8.609 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.59 | 4.65 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 41.18 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.97 | 13.39 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.67 | 97.60 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement