Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRCX vs FWWMX
FGRCX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FGRCX vs FWWMX
FGRCX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRCX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRCX is a Buy and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FGRCX (7.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FGRCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs FGRCX (0.00). FGRCX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FGRCX (19 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FGRCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGRCX (16.00). FGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: FGRCX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FGRCX return over 5 years is better than : 85.27 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FGRCX | FWWMX | FGRCX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.31 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.31 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 4.506 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 2.09 | 709% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.67 | 30.23 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.27 | 30.17 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement