Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRCX vs FXAIX
FGRCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts FGRCX vs FXAIX
FGRCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. FGRCX (6.97B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than FGRCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs FGRCX (0.03). FGRCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: FGRCX (18 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). FGRCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). FGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FGRCX (0) and FXAIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. FGRCX (26.84). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.64 vs. FGRCX (78.93).
| FGRCX | FXAIX | FGRCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 10,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 10,933% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.355 | 11.562 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 832B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.84 | 29.57 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.95 | 84.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.93 | 94.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.91 | 301.46 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement