Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRCX vs VTSMX
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FGRCX vs VTSMX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock C
Price$27.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.79
Change+$0.34 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. FGRCX (4.22B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FGRCX: VTSMX (1.12) vs FGRCX (0.15). FGRCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FGRCX (17 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). FGRCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). FGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). FGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: FGRCX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). FGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.42 vs. VTSMX (11.56). FGRCX return over 5 years is better than : 102.48 vs. VTSMX (88.87).
| FGRCX | VTSMX | FGRCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.100 | 6.038 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.22B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.12 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.42 | 11.56 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.94 | 59.89 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.48 | 88.87 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.33 | 189.65 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement