Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRCX vs VTSMX
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FGRCX vs VTSMX
FGRCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRCX is a Hold and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.31T vs. FGRCX (6.97B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FGRCX: VTSMX (0.93) vs FGRCX (0.03). FGRCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FGRCX (18 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). FGRCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.06). FGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. VTSMX (3.00). FGRCX (0) and VTSMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.19 vs. FGRCX (24.38). FGRCX return over 5 years is better than : 80.33 vs. VTSMX (68.72).
| FGRCX | VTSMX | FGRCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.06 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.06 | 2,733% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 10.391 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 2.31T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.93 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 26.19 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.63 | 72.57 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.33 | 68.72 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.58 | 268.89 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement