Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FGROX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Institutional
Price$30.00
Change+$1.12 (+3.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.17
Change+$0.39 (+2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.17M
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGROX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGROX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. WCMLX (45.2M). FGROX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FGROX (1.29) vs WCMLX (0.00). FGROX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FGROX (17 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FGROX (0.82). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FGROX (45.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGROX: WCMLX (100000) vs FGROX (1000000). FGROX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. WCMLX (5.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.82 vs. FGROX (-1.16).
| FGROX | WCMLX | FGROX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.068 | 7.154 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 45.2M | 2,436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 5.59 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 27.83 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.16 | 22.82 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement