Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FGROX vs WCMLX
Emerald Growth Institutional
Price$29.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGROX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGROX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. WCMLX (41.1M). FGROX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FGROX (1.15) vs WCMLX (0.00). FGROX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FGROX (17 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FGROX (0.80). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FGROX (45.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGROX: WCMLX (100000) vs FGROX (1000000). FGROX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. WCMLX (-2.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. FGROX (-11.68).
| FGROX | WCMLX | FGROX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.853 | 1.400 | 990% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 41.1M | 2,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | -2.18 | -331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 20.96 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.68 | -0.99 | 1,184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.01 | N/A | - |