Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGROX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGROX has more cash in the bank: 1.48B vs. WCMLX (51.9M). FGROX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGROX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FGROX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FGROX (0.80). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FGROX (45.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGROX: WCMLX (100000) vs FGROX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. FGROX (13.70). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. FGROX (-14.35).
| FGROX | WCMLX | FGROX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.399 | 11.410 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 51.9M | 2,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.70 | 17.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 32.50 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.35 | 3.16 | -454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers