Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FGROX vs WCMLX
FGROX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGROX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGROX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. WCMLX (54.2M). FGROX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGROX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FGROX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FGROX (0.80). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FGROX (45.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGROX: WCMLX (100000) vs FGROX (1000000). FGROX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.90 vs. WCMLX (22.61). FGROX return over 5 years is better than : 11.71 vs. WCMLX (3.79).
| FGROX | WCMLX | FGROX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.79 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.941 | 13.517 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 54.2M | 2,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.90 | 22.61 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.45 | 28.03 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.71 | 3.79 | 309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers