Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VFWPX
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R6
Price$43.09
Change+$0.49 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$139.20
Change+$1.36 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. FGRSX (1.45B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VFWPX (2.83) vs FGRSX (1.60). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGRSX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGRSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGRSX (13.91) and VFWPX (13.77) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.97 vs. FGRSX (39.22).
| FGRSX | VFWPX | FGRSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.333 | 15.437 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 65.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.91 | 13.77 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.10 | 33.63 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.22 | 44.97 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.24 | 46.05 | 90% |