Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VFWPX
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R6
Price$46.47
Change+$0.25 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$151.29
Change+$0.71 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. FGRSX (1.56B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VFWPX (2.74) vs FGRSX (1.48). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGRSX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGRSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.02 vs. VFWPX (16.95). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. FGRSX (36.12).
| FGRSX | VFWPX | FGRSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.643 | 26.271 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 74.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.74 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.02 | 16.95 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.62 | 64.31 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.12 | 43.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.69 | 69.74 | 90% |