Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGRSX vs VFWPX
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGRSX vs VFWPX
FGRSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGRSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGRSX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 94.4B vs. FGRSX (1.5B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGRSX: VFWPX (2.62) vs FGRSX (2.29). FGRSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGRSX (13 years) vs VFWPX (16 years). FGRSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). FGRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGRSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.05 vs. FGRSX (12.91). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.90 vs. FGRSX (14.90).
| FGRSX | VFWPX | FGRSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.490 | 13.944 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 94.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 2.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | 26.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.08 | 55.80 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.90 | 33.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.54 | 116.07 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement